You are not signed in (Login or Join Free)   |   Help
Sploofus Trivia
Trivia GamesCommunityLeaderboardsTournaments
MySploofus
You are here:  Home  >>  Chat Forums  >>  The Salty Dog  >>  View Chat Message

View Chat Message



Pages:  1    


bigmama60
Bigmama60  (Level: 95.2 - Posts: 6648)
Tue, 16th Jun '09 5:02 AM

HOW MANY APOLOGIES CAN THERE BE?

How many times does Letterman need to apologize to this Rubber Dodo award winner need? Source:www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/sep/18/uselections2008.sarahpalin1
Sarah Palin is getting more media attention than deserved. Sarah should accept the apology and move on. As a mother and grandmother I understand her defending her daughters. But this serial liar is going about finding her niche for 2012 in the wrong way.

Sarah Palin's escapade into the media's attention is garnering a group not only who won't accept David Letterman's insincere (so Sarah and they term it) but now they want him fired.
Source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/06/15/letterman-apologizes-to-p_n_215927.html

Sarah Palin inserted her younger daughter's name including statutory rape into the debacle.

Sarah Palin, if she is to be ubiquitously everywhere, except Alaska should start arguing intelligently (without scaring people about Big Brother watching) talking about the economy, health-care reform, and relevant foreign and domestic issues would certainly help her 2012 re-introduction. You betcha. She should also accept the stimulus package to help her state. She can't do that since she doesn't read the papers... LOL. That would the first intelligent thing Sarah Palin could do! Sarah Palin should reverse course and accept the $28.6 million in stimulus money for energy programs. Alaska could really use the money. Sarah should be cooperative not divisive. Sarah should stop smiling and get serious.

For the silly people marching in front of the Ed Sullivan theater demanding his head... DAVE Letterman OWNS his Late Night Show as well as the Late, Late Show with Craig Ferguson. Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Worldwide_pants

Yes, Don Imus apologized just before he was fired but Imus had a history of unsavory racial remarks; Letterman doesn't.

Bill O'Reilly is constantly stirring up calls for someone losing their job. It was a raw deal he did with MCI and Danny Glover and others as well. Groups should assemble before Fox Studios and demand Bill O's head for inciting hate and fear mongering.

Next, why should Leon Panetta apologize to Dick Cheney for saying "it's almost as if (Cheney's) wishing this country would be attacked again, in order to make his point" that America is less safe because of President Obama's policies. I watched MSNBC's Ed Schultz take his camera to the streets and was in total shock. People are fearful of an attack.

I think heartless Dick Cheney gets a tingle up his leg at the thought of WAR.







caramel1
Caramel1  (Level: 128.2 - Posts: 21598)
Tue, 16th Jun '09 6:02 AM

Boy it took you a long time to get to the Cheney thing-you're slipping. Here is Cheney's response http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/06/15/cheney-hopes-panetta-misquoted-claiming-vp-wishes-attack/ My question is what difference to you or anyone else who criticizes him does it make what Cheney says? He is a private citizen not in charge of anything or running for anything. If he wants to say he thinks Obama is not be careful with our safety, he has EVERY right to say that. Do so wish you would concentrate on those leading-know it would be hard to find positives.. Much more convenient for you to bash those that used to be or might be.

collioure
Collioure  (Level: 104.7 - Posts: 9952)
Tue, 16th Jun '09 6:14 AM

Beverly, Dave has yet to offer an appropriate apology.

As for Panetta Cheney handled the uncalled for outburst rather elegantly. Pretty bad slip for Leon IMO.

mplaw51
Mplaw51  (Level: 179.5 - Posts: 1582)
Tue, 16th Jun '09 6:38 AM

The Letterman/Palin thing should die a natural death. Letterman will likely never properly apologize and Palin needs to stop riding this for all its worth. It's lunacy to ask for Letterman's job.

It was a matter of time before someone made that remark about Dick Cheney. The head of the CIA isn't the one you'd expect to be making it.

caramel1
Caramel1  (Level: 128.2 - Posts: 21598)
Tue, 16th Jun '09 7:12 AM

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/06/11/obama-plans-americorps-inspector-general-scandal/ At one time then Senator Obama signed on to a bill that in order to fire one of these guy-kind of the reason behind Supreme court having it for life so as not to be pressured-the guy had to be given a 3 week notice and a specific reason given to Congress. Surely no oned could believe he was fired because he had found corruption linked to a basketball buddy of the prez LOL

caramel1
Caramel1  (Level: 128.2 - Posts: 21598)
Tue, 16th Jun '09 7:15 AM

Though my last post relevant because you thought it ridiculous to make a big deal over someone getting fired....

smoke
Smoke  (Level: 96.7 - Posts: 12009)
Tue, 16th Jun '09 7:26 AM

He did properly apologize last night. Now if it will just be enough....

caramel1
Caramel1  (Level: 128.2 - Posts: 21598)
Tue, 16th Jun '09 7:55 AM

Just heard his proper apology that he made last night. Don't believe he ever would have made it if a huge issue had not been made about what he said. However, he made a sincere apology and believf e it will be to Palin's detriment if she continues to make what he said an issue. As for supporters they often run things into the ground and it often hurts the person that the issue was about.

smokydevil
Smokydevil  (Level: 163.0 - Posts: 5381)
Tue, 16th Jun '09 7:58 AM

Who made a big issue out of getting fired? I want to read the post!!


caramel1
Caramel1  (Level: 128.2 - Posts: 21598)
Tue, 16th Jun '09 8:10 AM

Beverly- if you read back over this thread said something about folks should march on Fox Studios as they are ALWAYS calling for someone's head. Thought that gave me license to post the firing of the Inspector General by Obama as he certainly did that and has a lot more power than Fox or any individual there. Don't expect many to read the article that I posted though...

caramel1
Caramel1  (Level: 128.2 - Posts: 21598)
Tue, 16th Jun '09 10:01 AM

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,526525,00.html Palin herself seems done with it-perhaps her supporters will not hurt her aspirations if she has them by pursuing anything further

bigmama60
Bigmama60  (Level: 95.2 - Posts: 6648)
Tue, 16th Jun '09 10:23 AM



Stoutyoungladd
http://www.foxnews.com/search-results/m/22615347/double-standard.htm double sandard video

Notice these captions: They fired David Letterman movement is growing outrage citizens are now calling. Another lie by Fox Noise. Letterman cannot be fired.

http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/tv/2009/06/15/2009-06-15_fire_david_letterman_campaign_takes_root_protest_planned_over_comment_on_sarah_p.html

http://www.nydailynews.com/topics/FireDavidLetterman.com

caramel1
Caramel1  (Level: 128.2 - Posts: 21598)
Tue, 16th Jun '09 10:38 AM

The video I saw did not mention the Rev., Sharpton but he indeed uses a double standard for judging like on as to who can say what and get away with it. The firing of Don Imus is an example. Believe the Hannity video was made befre he heard Letterman's sincere apology. Said before don't like Hannity much and the link I posted says Palin is done with it and hopefully anyone who wshes her success will be also-Linda

caramel1
Caramel1  (Level: 128.2 - Posts: 21598)
Tue, 16th Jun '09 10:49 AM

Perhaps, Beverly, Hannity will really put it out there and say something like folks are hoping Letterman's or the Reverend Sharton's kidneys fail-that is crossing the line

bigmama60
Bigmama60  (Level: 95.2 - Posts: 6648)
Tue, 16th Jun '09 11:03 AM

Not true, Linda

I watched Hannity last night as I always do. Hannity had received a tape prior to the CBS broadcast regarding the apology for last night. Hannity wanted to know from Al Sharpton if he would march the women . Sharpton said No. maybe it will be in the transcript. Anyhow I don't know if they will still picket.


felix
Felix  (Level: 109.3 - Posts: 2500)
Tue, 16th Jun '09 11:16 AM

Start with ONE real and sincere apology and go from there. His left handed, lame a$$ apology looked as if it were made at gunpoint. Fire Letterman!

caramel1
Caramel1  (Level: 128.2 - Posts: 21598)
Tue, 16th Jun '09 11:19 AM


madamec8
Madamec8  (Level: 82.5 - Posts: 893)
Tue, 16th Jun '09 11:32 AM

This is all a media dream come true ... look at the time and space it has taken up.

caramel1
Caramel1  (Level: 128.2 - Posts: 21598)
Tue, 16th Jun '09 11:44 AM

Yes, watch the hands not the lips

crazy4games
Crazy4games  (Level: 123.0 - Posts: 1020)
Tue, 16th Jun '09 12:57 PM

Oh, for crying out loud!

The man made a bad joke. Who of us haven't, really? His apology seemed sincere to me.

jank0614
Jank0614  (Level: 67.1 - Posts: 4597)
Tue, 16th Jun '09 1:02 PM

Which one?

caramel1
Caramel1  (Level: 128.2 - Posts: 21598)
Tue, 16th Jun '09 1:03 PM

Yes, his last one did even though it came only after a "big deal' was made and I hope that is the end of it...

smoke
Smoke  (Level: 96.7 - Posts: 12009)
Tue, 16th Jun '09 1:10 PM

Maybe it came after he had the weekend to think things over. Benefit of the doubt is sometimes called for.

allena
Allena  (Level: 255.3 - Posts: 1390)
Tue, 16th Jun '09 1:20 PM

Does anyone think ratings against Conan O'Brian (now that Jay Leno is gone) and CBS getting stockholder requests for firing him, influenced his apology?

goddess28
Goddess28  (Level: 92.6 - Posts: 5236)
Tue, 16th Jun '09 1:32 PM

I hope he stands up and says " I have apoligized, and I am not going to discuss it any further". It's over, there is much more news worthy items than this. Just makes me dislike Palin all the more for keeping it going.

caramel1
Caramel1  (Level: 128.2 - Posts: 21598)
Tue, 16th Jun '09 1:36 PM

Why do I get the feeling, Goddess, that it would be almost as impossible for you to dislike Palin than you already do? It would be like me saying if Obama does/.doesn't do this one thing, I will REALLY dislike what he is doing/not doing. LOL

goddess28
Goddess28  (Level: 92.6 - Posts: 5236)
Tue, 16th Jun '09 1:39 PM

I was going to vote for McCain, (my mother was none too happy) I didnt care for Palin but I didn't care for Biden either. The Supreme Court changed my vote. So if you assume I am an Obama girl, you would be wrong. But he is the President and we should support him.

smoke
Smoke  (Level: 96.7 - Posts: 12009)
Tue, 16th Jun '09 1:39 PM

I mentioned the possibility of a Conan connection early on, Jim. It's all business to the network, of course, but I do think it was a mistake and a misunderstanding on Letterman's part and he gets it now, and I have to believe Palin has enough class to let it go. Benefit of the doubt all around.

caramel1
Caramel1  (Level: 128.2 - Posts: 21598)
Tue, 16th Jun '09 1:54 PM

I was never a big Palin fan, but am aware of the double standard. When one faction says something about someone in a public forum it is just good old fun or a mistake in bad taste. If one someone says it in another faction it is "HATE SPEECH". Glad Palin seems to have moved beyond this particular incident if she has serious political aspirations, but there is a large element in the public that is very tired of this double standard-include myself in that group Linda

jank0614
Jank0614  (Level: 67.1 - Posts: 4597)
Tue, 16th Jun '09 2:02 PM

Goddess - I hope he doesn't even go that far. The latest apology (was that #3? or just #2 plus other discussion?) was great.

Had he given that most recent apology first, I think it was MORE than fair and kind. But his first apology was what he really thinks (I don't have a leg to stand on to say that, so I gues IMO), but the most recent was given under pressure or it wouldn't even have needed to be offered.

I hope it's over. If Letterman will stop even addressing it, all will go back to right with the wor......oh rats, my lawnmower just ran out of gas (it was charging a dying battery). See what happens when Letterman screws up? Trickle down effect. Now I'll hafta jump it again.

collioure
Collioure  (Level: 104.7 - Posts: 9952)
Tue, 16th Jun '09 2:05 PM

Oh, the CIA today downplayed and essentially withdrew Panetta's toxic remark about Cheney.

I think I'll just chalk this up to Leon's having a bad time of it with the Obama administration.

He's not a bomb thrower.

goddess28
Goddess28  (Level: 92.6 - Posts: 5236)
Tue, 16th Jun '09 2:09 PM

Janice,

I think he was just as sincere in his first apology as she was put out by it.

smoke
Smoke  (Level: 96.7 - Posts: 12009)
Tue, 16th Jun '09 2:10 PM

Oh, good one!

bigmama60
Bigmama60  (Level: 95.2 - Posts: 6648)
Tue, 16th Jun '09 2:19 PM

Janice
I agree with goddess. Over the weekend he had more to think. This time and (I with you on the count) whether it was the second or the third I've lost the count he was able to articulate more so his sincerity. He did say it was his fault because of the perception. so to me it means he was always sincere.

jank0614
Jank0614  (Level: 67.1 - Posts: 4597)
Tue, 16th Jun '09 2:23 PM

But would he have been put out if he had meant it in the way of the wording of the last one? I dunno. I can only see it through the eyes of what I would do/mean, and what I've seen from Letterman in the past.

But I do hope you're right. And I hope he says not one thing more about it.

If he doesn't, and Palin and others say any more, it just shows them in an even worse light.

caramel1
Caramel1  (Level: 128.2 - Posts: 21598)
Tue, 16th Jun '09 2:28 PM

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/04/12/national/main2675273.shtml don''t quite see where this guy crossed the line more than with his "slutty flight attendant" but the Imus poor choice of words was not PC. After he was fired he personally went to Rutgers and apologized to those girls seemingly motivated by nothing more than he regretted his poor taste. It is who you are and who you insult not what you say Linda Never stay p late enough for Letterman anyway...

collioure
Collioure  (Level: 104.7 - Posts: 9952)
Tue, 16th Jun '09 2:48 PM

I just read about Dave's apology (Letterman, that is ). Very fine apology.

Imus's remark was much further out of bounds and he deserved to be tossed permanently. Inexcusable, that one.

caramel1
Caramel1  (Level: 128.2 - Posts: 21598)
Tue, 16th Jun '09 2:57 PM

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnic_slur this list is most likely incomplete. It depends a great dea lwho you are what and where you can say something-use all the rationalization you want to use- Linda

bigmama60
Bigmama60  (Level: 95.2 - Posts: 6648)
Tue, 16th Jun '09 3:20 PM

Also Andy
Imus had a history of making racial slurs. I remember Clarence Page and a few other journalist calling him on the carpet. Imus promised to do better. I think he had 2 reprimands prior to the girls basketball slur. He ever called Gwen Ifil the clean-up lady

collioure
Collioure  (Level: 104.7 - Posts: 9952)
Tue, 16th Jun '09 3:24 PM

Gwen Ifill? She's one of the very best correspondents of all.

Which reminds me to return to the PBS site for more news coverage and to watch less of Brian Williams.

bigmama60
Bigmama60  (Level: 95.2 - Posts: 6648)
Tue, 16th Jun '09 3:27 PM

okay

caramel1
Caramel1  (Level: 128.2 - Posts: 21598)
Tue, 16th Jun '09 3:35 PM


caramel1
Caramel1  (Level: 128.2 - Posts: 21598)
Tue, 16th Jun '09 3:54 PM

Of course, Reverend Sharpton makes sense in defense of this.,.. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EazOe4n8peM

bigmama60
Bigmama60  (Level: 95.2 - Posts: 6648)
Tue, 16th Jun '09 4:03 PM

Linda,

That's so old and has absolutely nothing to do with Imus' situtation.There even were jokes about squirrels hiding their nuts whenever they would see Jessie. He was very repentant about his faux pas. Have you seen or heard anything more of that type of language from him.? No, because he was sorry just like Letterman. Imus was warned 3 times about his language and he didn't change.

caramel1
Caramel1  (Level: 128.2 - Posts: 21598)
Tue, 16th Jun '09 4:21 PM

Sorry , doesn't seem that "old' to me as the Rev. Wright recently had words to say about Jews. It was not that long ago that Ms. Sykes wished Limbaugh's kidneys would fail But, of course, that is not hate speech. I could and will find other examples of "acceptable" reverse racism and/or hate speech by prominent people if you force me to go there. Letterman just didn't insult the wrong person and his stance is in current vogue- For the record-could care less about Palin, Letterman, Imus, Wright, Jackson or Sharpton. It is this ignoring of the "elephant in the living room" that infuriates me. That elephant has a name it is "double standard". Linda

collioure
Collioure  (Level: 104.7 - Posts: 9952)
Tue, 16th Jun '09 4:23 PM

It might be old, Beverly, but it is relevant in the sense that it exposes a double standard.

bigmama60
Bigmama60  (Level: 95.2 - Posts: 6648)
Tue, 16th Jun '09 4:41 PM

Linda
What was your point? Greta always gives these very ugly interviews to people she feels are beneath her ( at least it appears so ) She interviewed Condelezza Rice and you could see the hate and envy in her face and eyes. She rarely looked at the Secretary of State. On the other hand, she interviewed Sarah I thought she was going to jump in Sarah's mouth; she was so enamored . Greta can't convert everyone to her thinking. Didn't the Rev defend women there. I mean for you and Greta to go there is like comparing apples to oranges.
Maybe you can find her interview with Condelezza Rice and see for yourself.

caramel1
Caramel1  (Level: 128.2 - Posts: 21598)
Tue, 16th Jun '09 5:02 PM

http://vodpod.com/watch/1258564-bobby-rush-daring-anyone-to-challenge-roland-burris-as-obamas-replacement-in-the-senate yes, and you defend Rush for threatening anyone who votes againstseating Burris as the equal to a lynch mob. That turned out to be a really good choice. There is an ELEPHANT in the living room and I can keep going.THAT is my point not Greta nor her envy or ny of the stuff (changed my word on that one) you put out there

bigmama60
Bigmama60  (Level: 95.2 - Posts: 6648)
Tue, 16th Jun '09 5:04 PM

Me?

caramel1
Caramel1  (Level: 128.2 - Posts: 21598)
Tue, 16th Jun '09 5:32 PM

I will go one step further for you, Beverely. If in your mind you can reverse it and think about how you would feel about the "White Caucus" voting as a group in the lawmakers. Or perhaps how you might feel if someone came around at your job collecting for the "White United Foundation" A double standard exists and idss the "elephant in the living room"- justify and rationalize it however you choose- Linda

caramel1
Caramel1  (Level: 128.2 - Posts: 21598)
Tue, 16th Jun '09 5:38 PM

I will grant you there was a time when all lawmakers were one big "White Caucus" and laws have been passed and in most places enforced to correct that. Just believe it is dishonest for anyone to say that PC does not play to a double standard-thus the "elephant" in the living room. Linda

bigmama60
Bigmama60  (Level: 95.2 - Posts: 6648)
Tue, 16th Jun '09 6:11 PM

As long as the White Caucus voted the way the Kennedy's, and the like; no problem.
Linda, I think you're blacking out. Take it easy.

maurlin
Maurlin  (Level: 213.3 - Posts: 2671)
Tue, 16th Jun '09 6:18 PM

It seems to be a real difficulty for some folks on Sploofus to share different points of view without attacking other Sploofus members. Does that really have to be done?

collioure
Collioure  (Level: 104.7 - Posts: 9952)
Tue, 16th Jun '09 6:22 PM

Well, Beverly, I have no problem with the Black Caucus voting as a bloc in the Congress. Caucusing is a natural function in politics.

The problem I have with the Black Caucus is that it is more than just an informal caucus. It is a standing committee using taxpayer dollars, and it effectively practices segregation in the halls of Congress, one absolutely horrible example of racism.

Of course, I don't want any such committees practicing segregation to exist.

bigmama60
Bigmama60  (Level: 95.2 - Posts: 6648)
Tue, 16th Jun '09 6:23 PM

Thank you
I'm certainly trying to tone it down. But it's not easy when you're being attacked personally.

collioure
Collioure  (Level: 104.7 - Posts: 9952)
Tue, 16th Jun '09 6:27 PM

Pardon me, but I do not see any personal attacks here.

bigmama60
Bigmama60  (Level: 95.2 - Posts: 6648)
Tue, 16th Jun '09 6:28 PM

Andy, all you seem to think a about is money. I have have a problem with crooked lawmakers who pay no taxes and live off the backs of common people like me. After the last eight years of the past administration you should know that very well.

bigmama60
Bigmama60  (Level: 95.2 - Posts: 6648)
Tue, 16th Jun '09 6:35 PM

Only, because I 've decided to not attack you personally. I've decided it's time for us to be more more civil to each other. I really was joking with the money comment. I hope you realized it was a joke.

collioure
Collioure  (Level: 104.7 - Posts: 9952)
Tue, 16th Jun '09 6:39 PM

Money? Get real. This isn't about money.

This is about racism practiced in the halls of Congress. There also is an Hispanic Caucus.

bigmama60
Bigmama60  (Level: 95.2 - Posts: 6648)
Tue, 16th Jun '09 6:50 PM

Andy

"Money? Get real. This isn't about money.

This is about racism practiced in the halls of Congress. There also is an Hispanic Caucus."

_-------------------------------------------------------------------------
That's your opinion and you're entitled to it. Since you keep wanting to refer to racism, what do you think institutional racism which still exists overtly and covertly in this country is? "Caucusing is a natural function in politics", as you said. Caucusing is also a response to institutional racism. Can you speak for African and Hispanic American values?

collioure
Collioure  (Level: 104.7 - Posts: 9952)
Tue, 16th Jun '09 6:58 PM

Beverly, I do not want to see, and I do not practice racism. Over the years I saw less and less of it in the USA, such that I was shocked by the overt anti-Moslem racism I ran into upon arrival in France 7 years ago.

Caucusing is not a response to racism. It arises from common interests.

If you're suggesting a rationale for these committees (they are much more than caucuses), please don't. There is no rationale for segregated committees in Congress.

caramel1
Caramel1  (Level: 128.2 - Posts: 21598)
Tue, 16th Jun '09 7:36 PM

Beverly, you begin every post of yours by not only attacking Fox annd the Fox personalities but by reducing the people who view Fox as ditto heads or freaks or some like term. You not only attack an entity like Fox or public personalties like Cheney, Bush, and Palin but the people who support them which includes many on Sploofus. You take any disagreement with you or Obama- as you cannot somehow separate one from the other -as a personal attack on you. I should have learned long ago that it is impossible to talk rto someone who doesn't seem to differiate between disagreeing with a President's plolicies and viewers of particular news media are somehow against you the person. No, I am not blaclkng out.. I am being truthful. Linda

maurlin
Maurlin  (Level: 213.3 - Posts: 2671)
Tue, 16th Jun '09 7:52 PM

<>

Just look at the response above this one.

caramel1
Caramel1  (Level: 128.2 - Posts: 21598)
Tue, 16th Jun '09 7:56 PM

It was the truth, Maurlin - Just as the title of Tex's thread way back got people angry from the start as it attacked supporters of a public personality

maurlin
Maurlin  (Level: 213.3 - Posts: 2671)
Tue, 16th Jun '09 8:10 PM

"Pardon me, but I do not see any personal attacks here." ????? Not looking very hard.

bigmama60
Bigmama60  (Level: 95.2 - Posts: 6648)
Tue, 16th Jun '09 8:25 PM

Am I supposed to say yes you are BLACKING out? That is so juvenile.We are not school children. You're guilty of some partisan posts too young lady.

sandracam
Sandracam  (Level: 149.3 - Posts: 4190)
Tue, 16th Jun '09 8:38 PM

Yah, young lady! Apparently BigMama doesn't check out profiles!

caramel1
Caramel1  (Level: 128.2 - Posts: 21598)
Tue, 16th Jun '09 8:38 PM

I attempt to deal with issue that I disagree or agree on. Mostly I disagree with pretty much everything Obama says and does or does not do. I have pretty much quit using TOTUS when I refer to him although I think it apt but know the term itself is "toxic" like the terms you use to describe people that many here on Sploofus admire. I don't like any politician much as believe a huge majority of them are disconnected from the folks they are supposed to represent mostly because of no term limits. Also believe the process of getting elected and then paying the chits you owe tends to lead to corruption- Linda

sargon
Sargon  (Level: 112.0 - Posts: 1256)
Wed, 17th Jun '09 2:54 AM

Letterman has apologized for his joke.

Now Palin should apologize for the terrible showing she made as a vice presidental candidate.



caramel1
Caramel1  (Level: 128.2 - Posts: 21598)
Wed, 17th Jun '09 4:46 AM

There is debate, Saragon, whether Palin being on the ticket actually helped old McCain poor showing that he made notwithstanding. On issues there was no real choice and Obama just plain out smoothed and out machined McCain. Some think Palin was the only spark of life on that side of the election-couldn't say as didn't pay attention and didn't vote-won't happen again Linda

collioure
Collioure  (Level: 104.7 - Posts: 9952)
Wed, 17th Jun '09 4:48 AM

Maurlin, that is not a personal attack by any stretch of the imagination.

It is a discussion of posting tactics evidenced here.

collioure
Collioure  (Level: 104.7 - Posts: 9952)
Wed, 17th Jun '09 4:56 AM

Maurlin, this from Dave on another thread is a personal attack.

"I'm with Barnie, I've heard nothing about it on any of the news stations i watch. Did you see it on Fox Andy ?"

(Of course, I don't get Fox and the reference was from the Independent in the UK)


Pages:  1    



Copyright © 2003-2016 Sploofus Holdings LLC.  All rights reserved.
Legal Notice & Privacy Statement  |  Link to Sploofus